🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to address white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the month is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the current time in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the records is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how little it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in educational programs. It would also be a time that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.